So! What I’ve been doing at McDonalds, aside from facebooking and pretending to blog (yep, sorry about that. I’ve been sick all week and crazy busy with my architecture class!), is pulling up Wikipedia biographies, reading various news articles from BBC, and trying to learn more about the world… the big thing we’re apart of together. After learning about the plane accident from Brazil to Paris, I looked up French President Nicolas Sarkozy’s bio. I’ve always gotten a good vibe from him for some reason and wanted to know more. A self affirmed conservative politician, he wishes to see involvement and some specific funding between church and state. He wants to get rid of any financial assistance to the unemployed, and has also stated (according to Wikipedia, but this sounds like something he would proclaim) that Islam is one of the most peaceful religions in the world. He’s been divorced multiple times, and is currently married to pop-culture icon, singer Carla Bruni.
What do you think?
Ok let’s read a little more in depth. C’mon, some research before we come to any conclusions, please. Wishes for more involvement between church and state comes most directly from his desire to increase immigration. He comes from a multi cultural family; his father was Hungarian and mother French. After being abandoned by his father at a young age, he grew up in a lower middle class town and never excelled during his early education. He fully acknowledges that there is a need for outside help in the French workforce, and wants to encourage skilled workers from other countries to work and obtain citizenship in France. He wants to financially support religious establishments, mostly Mosques, because they currently have very limited support that does nothing but reduce the number of Muslims who wish to live in France. He wants to reduce, if not eliminate, benefits the unemployed receive IF they’ve been offered work and refused. He wants to improve U.S./France relations, and is one of the few French politicians to have this on his agenda.
You have the information I’ve given you. This is my understanding. This is what I took from the articles I read and the biography I enjoyed. So what do you think? Will you read more? Will this be a sufficient amount of information on a topic you don’t really think or care about? I don’t want to attack anyone’s desire or lack there of to learn about foreign politics, but it isn’t really foreign.
It’s important to know. Arguably, everything is. It’s valuable information on an individual who is a part of this world and has the ability to change it. Barack Obama has this ability. Sarah Palin has this. Any professor has this, along with any businessman, currently unemployed person, journalist, student, NOT a student, entrepreneur, architect, stay at home parent, Atheist /Catholic /Lutheran /Buddhist /Scientologist /Muslim /Unitarian… ANYONE. Vladimir Putin has this ability.
I didn’t know anything about this man except that he was apparently stirring up trouble and Mrs. Palin had her eye on him. I pulled up his bio. How does one try to explain or attempt to even understand the inner workings of a politician, nay a man, who has taken on the responsibility of defending and building up a country who has been attacked on so many different levels. Atheism, Catholicism, Communism, War, Deception, Secrecy, Power, Repression, Expression, Beauty, Strength … all words that come to mind when I think about Russia. They have their guard up: an entire country on defense. Could this explain the stern faces I see everyday I commute to school? Could the ethics and inner workings of the KGB (police force in Russia) be attributed to this shield? In 1812, Russia was invaded by Napoleon. Aleksander the first surrendered Moscow to him and his army, hoping that this strategic move would save the Russian army from being destroyed entirely, a solid and smart move on his part. Napoleon didn’t even last one winter. He abandoned his troops, and he and a few of his generals fled back to France. From a combination of a hostile population and the harshest of winters, Napoleon lost his entire army stationed in Moscow. Hitler attempted this in Leningrad, which is now St. Petersburg, but as we know, ultimately failed.
Their political system has been under attack for as long as an opposing government has existed to counter it. Why is it so hard to believe that a government different from ours could have ever functionally taken care of its citizens? Democracy, right? That is the only way, yes? ...NO?!?! Say whaa?!
We’ve allowed the media to spoon-feed us our education and opinions. They publish their points of view in major papers, so why wouldn’t they be completely true? Ah, this is where they get us. THE INTONATION!!!!! AAHHH!!!!! We cannot dismiss the tone in which information is delivered. If we do this, we’re fools who haven’t done their homework. Our opinions then become far too malleable, and subject to changing on a whim.
I understand that it’s a little easier to just read, briefly reflect, and move on. There is no such thing as “just reading” or “briefly reflecting”, however. When we read something opinionated or seemingly well written, it touches us differently than a poorly written or boring piece of writing. It moves us towards accepting what they’ve written as the truth, whether we verbally state that we do or not. That’s important: “We move towards accepting what they’ve written as the truth.” Our reflection occurs when the topic at hand comes up in conversation or lecture or another piece of writing. You then present the information you’ve obtained, and develop your version of that opinion when you explain or defend your point of view.
A vicious cycle. We know what we know because someone said it, we read it, or we took one or both of those things to form our own belief about it. I believe in all of those things. I believe in reading the shitty articles! I believe in the beautiful opinionated thoughts publications, the poems, the children’s stories, random bits of info you find online. I believe in talking with people and listening. That includes children and adolescent and all of those young adults who were told they’re “too young” to understand or know something.
I believe that as long as the foundation for which my beliefs stem is excited to learn, I will be set to process and enjoy all of the knowledge the world has to offer. As long as I am open to new ideas, to “new revelations”, to new people, to new understandings of those people and ideas and revelations… I will be able to grow and affect others to grow with me.